Annex A: Suggested literature and guidelines, Standards Drugs Analysis and Interpretation

  • ‘Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines, deel I-VI (serie)’:
  • Aalberg, L. Andersson, K., Bertler, C. Borén, H. (2005). Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines I: Synthesis of standards and compilation of analytical data. Forensic Science International (149) 2-3, p. 219-229.
  • Aalberg, L., Andersson, K., Bertler, C., Cole, M.D. e.a. (2005). Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines II: Stability of impurities in organic solvents. Forensic Science International (149) 2-3, p. 231-241.
  • Andersson, K., Jalava, K., Lock, E., Finnon, Y. e.a.(2007). Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines III: Development of the gas chromatographic method. Forensic Science International, (169) 1, p. 50-63.
  • Andersson, K., Jalava, K., Lock, E. Huizer e.a. (2007). Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines IV: Optimisation of sample preparation. Forensic Science International (169) 1, p. 64-76.
  • Aalberg, L., Andersson, K., Dahlén, J., Lock, E. e.a. (2007) Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines V: Determination of the variability of the optimised method. Forensic Science International (169) 1 , p. 77-85.
  • Andersson, K., Lock, E., Jalava, K., Huizer H. e.a. (2007). Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines VI: Evaluation of methods for comparison of amphetamine. Forensic Science International, (169) 1, p. 86-99.
  • Deursen, M.M. van, Lock, E.R.A., Poortman- van der Meer, A.J. (2006). Organic impurity profiling of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) tablets seized in the Netherlands. Science & Justice (46), p. 135 -152.
  • Donnell jr., C. R. (2003), Forensic Investigation of Clandestine Laboratories. Professional Business Solutions, USA: O'Fallon.
  • International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) (2002). Guidelines for Forensic Science Laboratories. ILAC, Rhodes, Australia.
  • Moffat, A.C., Osselton, D. M. and Widdop, B., (2011). Clarke’s Analysis of Drugs and Poisons: in pharmaceuticals, body fluids, and postmortem material.
  • London: Pharmaceutical Press.
  • United Nations Division of Narcotic Drugs (1986). Recommended Methods for Testing Cocaine. New York: United Nations.
  • United Nations Division of Narcotic Drugs (1989). Recommended Methods for Testing Lysergide (LSD). New York; United Nations.
  • United Nation Office on Drugs and Crime (2005). Methods for Impurity Profiling of Heroin and Cocaine. New York: United Nations.
  • United Nation Office on Drugs and Crime (2006). Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Amphetamine, Methamphetamine and their Ring-Substituted Analogues in Seized Materials. New York: United Nations.
  • United Nation Office on Drugs and Crime (2009). Recommended methods for the identification and analysis of cannabis and cannabis products. New York: United Nations.
  • United Nations in cooperation with the Drugs Working Group of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (2009). Guidelines on Representative Drug Sampling. New York: United Nations.
  • United Nations International Drug Control Programme (1998). Recommended Methods for Testing Opium, Morphine and Heroin. New York: United Nations.
  • United Nation Office on Drugs and Crime (2005). Methods for Impurity Profiling of Heroin and Cocaine. New York: United Nations.
  • United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention (2001). Drug Characterization/Impurity Profiling: Background and Concepts. New York: United Nations.
  • United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention (2013). Clandestine Manufacture of Substances under International Control. New York: United Nations.
  • List with publications scientists UNODC